Bipartisan Unemployment Benefits Bills in Both Houses

Sens. Jack Reed (D-RI) and Dean Heller (R-NV) have introduced a bill (S. 2532) in the Senate to extend benefits for the long-term unemployed for five months. Reps. Dan Kildee (D-MI) and Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ) have introduced companion legislation (H.R. 4970) in the House of Representatives.

For the first time in months, there is legislation in both houses of Congress to extend the Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC) program, which could provide some needed relief for more than 3.3 million Americans who have been unemployed for more than six months despite actively searching for jobs.

While there is widespread skepticism that both bills will pass, the legislation’s introduction has added fresh momentum to the call for extended unemployment benefits.

Similar to the five-month extension bill that expired at the end of May, the new legislation is completely paid for and will not add to the deficit. The $9.7 billion cost of the bills is offset by customs fees and a reduction in the tax-deductible pension fund contributions that corporations must make.

Disappointingly, the bills contain no retroactive pay for people who were cut off from EUC in December 2013. For these folks – many of whom have depleted their retirement savings, have been forced to sell their valuables, and have lost their homes – the bills offer only forward-looking support.


Being without emergency unemployment benefits for up to six months has left many families deep in debt, from which they might never emerge without the assistance provided by retroactive benefits.

 

Being without emergency unemployment benefits for up to six months has left many families deep in debt, from which they might never emerge without the assistance provided by retroactive benefits. The failure of some in Congress to act on behalf of these individuals with urgency will likely continue to haunt them in the form of forfeited educational opportunities and bad credit.

  • For Pamela in Glenn Springs, South Carolina, who is now three months behind on her mortgage, there will be no money to help her catch up and save her home.
  • For Donna in New York, New York, whose eldest child dropped out of college as her mother became homeless, there will be no relief or help to get her child back into a Bachelor’s degree program.
  • For Sharon in Louisville, Kentucky, who says she won’t be able to retire until she’s 70 because she’s depleted her 401(k), there will be no assistance that allows her to replenish her savings.

The exclusion of retroactive benefits will have these and other long-term impacts, which will reduce the security of working families and tax revenue for the government for years to come. According to the National Employment Law Project, “It appears that it’s been deemed politically impossible to include the fully retroactive provisions contained in the earlier Senate-passed extension. That is not merely unfortunate – it’s truly tragic.”

The Center for Effective Government will continue to host weekly Witness Wednesdays: Voices of the Unemployed events in July. The events start up again on July 9 at 12:30pm at the House Triangle at the foot of the Capitol building in Washington, DC. Events on July 16, July 23, and July 30 will be held at the same time and in the same location.

Along with our partners – the Coalition on Human Needs, the National Women’s Law Center, and the National Employment Law Project – we have welcomed more than a dozen members of Congress, numerous faith leaders, several labor leaders, and more than a handful of nonprofit leaders to read aloud stories from individuals and families who have fallen through the cracks. These stories have shattered stereotypes and have demonstrated that long-term unemployed Americans want the chance to roll up their sleeves, get back to work, and provide for their families.

For videos from the three June events, click here. Live-streaming of the July events will be provided on the Witness Wednesdays page, www.witnesswednesdays.org.

For additional information on the Witness Wednesdays: Voices of the Unemployed events, click the logo below.

For Further Reading

Unemployed Americans Kicked Out of Capitol, Forced to Share Their Stories OutsideThe Fine Print blog, May 10, 2014

Six Months after Emergency Unemployment Benefits Expired, 2.8 Million Americans Left BehindThe Fine Print blog, May 21, 2014

Witness Wednesdays: Stories of the Long-Term Unemployed to Be Read on Capitol HillThe Fine Print blog, June 10, 2014

Highway Trust Fund Temporarily Saved, Unemployed Still Waiting on EUC, The Fine Print Blog, July 18, 2014

Editor's note: This post has been updated since its original publication date.

back to Blog

I am praying for all of us WE THE PEOPLE....it sounds like progress is being made from the article I just read...we will at least get five months...its something...sad no retro...but hopefully the bread crumbs they throw at us will help a little. so many tragic stories and circumstances... god bless us all...and hope and pray they get the ball rolling and give us our money.....been too long...how many have to suffer at the hands of boner ??????
Thank you Jessica for the new article and continuing to support the EUC cause!
Politicians forget that for every person unemployed it impacts not 3 million but millions more and they remember will remember their family members and friends suffering at election time!
No RETRO NO TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH CALL WHITE HOUSE COMMENT LINE 202 456 1111
No retro no tax cuts
I strongly believe that those who have been eligible for retroactive benefits since Dec. and continued to properly certify their claims and actively seek work as dictated by their State until new legislation is passed restoring EUC benefits should at least be given the option to receive a lump sum payment or prospective benefits for up to 5 months. In contrast, for those that are just coming off of the regular 26 weeks of employment insurance they should only be allowed to receive prospective benefits for up to five months. In this way everyone gets up to a maximum of 5 months of assistance, but more importantly, those that needed the funds the most would have the option of receiving their payments first. In addition, because everyone will only be allowed a maximum of 5 months of benefits, the funding mechanism in place for the current legislation will be sufficient and not require further altering. I believe this is the only fair and pragmatic way to handle this debacle at this point! It is a true win/win for everyone involved! With July 4th around the corner, what better time for Congress, the President, and advocacy groups working on our behalf to demonstrate their patriotism than by equitably and fairly addressing the needs of those that have been severely impacted by this devastating economic tragedy through fault of their own! Therefore Congress, please sincerely work to craft a new bill that would include language with these changes.
Why should the American People pay into a unjust system. Unemployment Insurance should stop deducting money from our paychecks. Especially if the Senate and Congress will not honor the commitment of the program. Doing as they see fit is unjust and not the American Why!
Why should the American People pay into a unjust system. Unemployment Insurance should stop deducting money from our paychecks. Especially if the Senate and Congress will not honor the commitment of the program. Doing as they see fit is unjust and not the American Way!
I have wondered why the main street news did not mention that these millions of unemployed have a vote. Maybe voted Cantor out!
I've worked steady since I was 15 years old and never collected unemployment. At age 38 I was laid off at no fault of my own and got cut off of unemployment in December. I never received any extensions an am behind on everything. How is it fair that previous to me, people were able to collect for almost 2 years and now congress may pass an extension and I will be excluded. It is Congress's fault that the extension was not passed in a timely manner and we in the middle should not have to suffer due to their inability to come to a compromise. If we don't get an extension then no one forward should either. Why are we left behind?