On Dec. 28, 2006, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued an interim final rule for the creation of a chemical facility security program. However, the program appears to provide little means for increasing security and shrouds important assessments in a veil of secrecy that will prevent any public accountability or oversight.

With Democrats in control of Congress, 2007 will usher in an era of renewed government oversight. At the same time, the slim majority in Congress means it is unlikely that 2007 will be a time for passing legislation unless it is truly bipartisan. For advocates of fairness, honesty, and accountability in government, it is likely to be a busy and exciting year. However, for those who hope for increased spending on low-income programs and social justice initiatives, it may prove disappointing. Fiscal Policy

For years, the Bush administration has been labeled by many as the most secretive administration to occupy the White House in decades. This penchant for secrecy has pushed the pendulum far from openness and transparency. And while the pendulum did not swing back significantly in 2006, the movement toward greater secrecy was finally challenged and slowed. The year still contained many proposals to reduce government accountability and openness.

Throughout the past several years, attempts to roll back regulatory safeguards and delay new rulemaking have been common. 2006 proved to be no different, and several important issues garnered attention. Among these were sunset commission legislation, the nomination of Susan Dudley, and proposals to further complicate the regulatory process.